One of the narratives that’s emerged in the last week since BP capped the oil leak (temporarily) is that media outlets are now questioning whether the whole thing has been exaggerated.
Clearly, nothing major was happening there – we’ve been blowing this way out of proportion. This amount of thick crude can easily be handled by the natural marine ecosystem just as other natural seeps 1/1000 the size of this spill…….look at all these news stories questioning the seriousness of the spill!
Living up in metro Atlanta, I can confirm that local media and national media have dropped the story for the most part. Being NOLAderived, this is personally disappointing.
The oil isn’t “missing” — BP used dispersants, remember? So these dispersants have worked, making the oil sink below the surface where it cannot be skimmed, and where it bypasses berms. But as long as it’s not visible and skimmable, BP can’t be fined for it, or so the argument goes. The problem is that the oil itself is still present but will surface in unexpected locations within the ecosystem, because of the use of the extremely toxic dispersant Corexit.
Oh yes, there’s that — the dispersant is extremely toxic. Allegedly many of the cleanup workers from the Valdez are now dead.
So it’s up to us, as consumers of media, to demand that we continue to hold BP’s feet to the fire. The major media appear ready to allow the company’s plan for subterfuge to succeed, distracting us from the effects the oil is having on our environment in an effort to limit the liability cost.
The health and future of the Gulf depends on you.

